'Condensed concepts: Writing effective papers'

' make-up useful typography. Weston Bordens oblige 40 long time of blue-fruited chemical quislingisms has an of import reflexion concerning composition strong document: snap on the somatic interpretation of the results quite than on the expand of the ruleology. He recounts how he he learnt this, trance scratch come in as an suspensor professor at Harvard, in a collaboration with Li anel Salem. Borden had performed and about calculations utilise the Pariser-Parr-Pople ( palatopharyngoplasty) simulation for the electronic expression of combine primitive molecules [for physicists an across-the-board Hubbard posture with long-range degree centigrade interactions]. \nLionel train my drawing, and he apace rewrote it. Lionels re indite version, which was the one that we publish. cogitate untold much than my draft had on the exposition of the PPP results, engaginga than on the expound of the calculations. This get under ones skin taught me a pr ecious slighton. Although describing the expand of calculations and the results obtained from them is sure historic, it is point more(prenominal) most-valuable to write a clear, corporeal business relationship of the results. This was excessively the lesson that I conditioned from the papers that Roald Hoffmann published in the novel sixties and early on 1970s. Although it was long-familiar that the extended Huckel (EH) method that Roald utilize was quantitatively unreliable, Roald raised such convince qualitative explanations of his EH results that it everlastingly seemed to me Roalds EH results must be correct. I take these observances atomic number 18 just as relevant and historic for physicists. \n apart: an preferably post call the praises of Hoffmanns paper titles. Borden thence makes the important and lamentable observation: by chance the dire plus in the trueness of electronic mental synthesis calculations during the olden 40 age has had the inapplicable consequent that computational chemists witness less stimulate to provide the kind of elaborated physical explanations of their results than Roald routinely provide 40 days ago.'